AL amyloidosis and transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) are two of the most important forms of systemic amyloidosis, and both can involve the heart. Although they may produce similar clinical findings, they arise from completely different precursor proteins and require fundamentally different treatment strategies. (1, 2)
Correctly distinguishing AL from ATTR amyloidosis is therefore one of the most important steps in the diagnostic evaluation of a patient with suspected cardiac amyloidosis. Misclassification can delay appropriate disease-specific treatment. (2, 3)
Immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis, or AL amyloidosis, is caused by abnormal immunoglobulin light chains produced by a clonal population of plasma cells or, less commonly, another B-cell clone. These light chains or their fragments misfold and form amyloid fibrils that deposit within tissues and organs. (4)
AL amyloidosis is therefore fundamentally a hematologic disorder. It can involve multiple organs, including the heart, kidneys, peripheral and autonomic nervous systems, gastrointestinal tract, liver and soft tissues. (4)
Cardiac involvement is particularly important because it is a major determinant of prognosis. AL amyloidosis can progress rapidly, making timely recognition and hematologic assessment essential. (4)
Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is caused by misfolding and aggregation of transthyretin, a transport protein produced predominantly by the liver. ATTR occurs in two major forms. (5)
ATTR may primarily affect the heart, peripheral nerves, autonomic nervous system or a combination of these systems, depending on the form and specific genetic variant. (5)
Core distinction
AL amyloidosis: abnormal immunoglobulin light chains produced by a plasma cell or other B-cell clone.
ATTR amyloidosis: misfolded transthyretin, either wild-type or genetically variant.

There is substantial overlap between AL and ATTR amyloidosis, particularly when the heart is involved. Both can cause increased ventricular wall thickness, restrictive cardiac physiology, heart failure, atrial arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities. (2, 3)
The extracardiac phenotype can nevertheless provide important clues.
Macroglossia and periorbital purpura are classically associated with AL amyloidosis and may be particularly suggestive when present, although neither occurs in every patient. (4)
Musculoskeletal manifestations such as carpal tunnel syndrome and lumbar spinal stenosis may precede recognition of ATTR cardiomyopathy by several years. (6)

No. ECG abnormalities can increase suspicion for cardiac amyloidosis but generally cannot reliably distinguish AL from ATTR. Potential findings include low QRS voltage, pseudoinfarction patterns, atrial fibrillation and conduction abnormalities. (2)
Importantly, low voltage is not present in all patients with cardiac amyloidosis and should not be considered mandatory for diagnosis.
Echocardiography may raise strong suspicion for cardiac amyloidosis but usually cannot determine the amyloid precursor protein by itself. Common findings include increased ventricular wall thickness, diastolic dysfunction, biatrial enlargement and reduced longitudinal strain. (3)
Relative apical sparing of longitudinal strain can support suspicion for cardiac amyloidosis but should not be used as a standalone test to distinguish AL from ATTR.
Cardiac magnetic resonance can strongly support the presence of cardiac amyloidosis through findings such as diffuse late gadolinium enhancement, abnormal gadolinium kinetics, elevated native T1 and increased extracellular volume. (3)
Although some imaging characteristics may differ statistically between AL and ATTR populations, CMR alone generally cannot provide definitive amyloid typing. Further laboratory, scintigraphic or tissue evaluation is required.
When cardiac amyloidosis is suspected, assessment for a monoclonal immunoglobulin is a critical early step because AL amyloidosis requires urgent consideration. Recommended testing includes (2, 3):
No. A monoclonal gammopathy can coexist with ATTR amyloidosis, particularly in older adults. Therefore, detecting a monoclonal protein does not by itself establish that the amyloid deposits are AL. (2)
When a monoclonal protein is present and cardiac amyloidosis is suspected, additional specialist evaluation and, in many cases, tissue biopsy with definitive amyloid typing may be necessary.
Bone-avid tracer scintigraphy with validated tracers such as 99mTc-PYP, 99mTc-DPD or 99mTc-HMDP is highly valuable in the diagnostic evaluation of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis. (7)
The landmark multicentre study by Gillmore and colleagues demonstrated that, in an appropriate clinical setting, grade 2 or 3 cardiac uptake together with the absence of a monoclonal protein can establish a non-biopsy diagnosis of ATTR cardiac amyloidosis with very high specificity. (7)
Tissue biopsy becomes particularly important when the non-biopsy ATTR criteria are not fulfilled, when a monoclonal gammopathy is present, when imaging findings are discordant or when the amyloid type remains uncertain. (2, 3)
Amyloid deposits are traditionally identified using Congo red staining. However, simply proving that amyloid is present is insufficient. The deposited protein must also be accurately typed.
Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis is an important reference method for amyloid typing where available. (1)
Patient with suspected cardiac amyloidosis
↓
Perform monoclonal protein assessment
Serum free light chains + serum immunofixation + urine immunofixation
↓
If ATTR-CM remains suspected
Perform validated bone-avid tracer scintigraphy
↓
Grade 2/3 uptake + no monoclonal protein
ATTR-CM may be diagnosed noninvasively in the appropriate clinical context
↓
Monoclonal protein present or non-biopsy criteria not fulfilled
Further specialist assessment ± tissue biopsy and amyloid typing
↓
If ATTR is confirmed
Perform TTR genetic testing to distinguish ATTRv from ATTRwt
This is a simplified educational pathway and should be interpreted alongside detailed guidelines and the individual patient’s clinical context. (2, 3, 7)
The treatment of AL and ATTR amyloidosis is fundamentally different because the precursor proteins arise from different biological processes.
Treatment of AL amyloidosis targets the abnormal plasma-cell or B-cell clone responsible for producing the amyloidogenic immunoglobulin light chains. The therapeutic objective is rapid and deep suppression of light-chain production. (4)
Modern therapy commonly uses a daratumumab-based combination including bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in appropriate newly diagnosed patients. Autologous stem-cell transplantation remains an option for carefully selected patients. (4)
ATTR treatment targets the transthyretin disease pathway rather than a plasma-cell clone. Strategies include stabilizing circulating transthyretin, reducing hepatic TTR production and managing organ-specific complications. (5)
Treatment selection depends on whether the patient has cardiomyopathy, polyneuropathy or a mixed phenotype, as well as disease severity, regulatory approval, availability and individual clinical factors.
AL and ATTR amyloidosis may look similar clinically, especially when both present as cardiac amyloidosis. However, treatment for one does not treat the underlying cause of the other.
Accurate amyloid typing prevents inappropriate therapy and allows disease-specific treatment to begin as early as possible. For this reason, major cardiac amyloidosis guidance emphasizes defining the amyloid precursor protein rather than stopping once cardiac amyloid involvement is suspected. (2, 3)
The burden and distribution of both AL and ATTR amyloidosis across African countries remain incompletely characterized. Limited epidemiological data, variable access to specialized diagnostics and constrained availability of amyloid typing, nuclear scintigraphy and genetic testing can make accurate subtype diagnosis challenging in some settings. (8)
Hereditary ATTR is particularly relevant to African populations because the TTR p.Val142Ile variant, historically referred to as V122I, is associated with West African ancestry. A population genetic analysis demonstrated substantial variation in allele frequency across African populations, with comparatively higher frequencies in parts of West Africa. (9)
The presence of a TTR variant should not be equated with clinically manifest amyloidosis because penetrance is incomplete and clinical expression varies. Likewise, genetic carrier frequency should not be used as a substitute for direct epidemiological studies of ATTR-CM in African populations.
Strengthening access to appropriate monoclonal protein testing, cardiac imaging, amyloid typing, scintigraphy and genetic testing will be important for improving accurate differentiation of AL and ATTR amyloidosis across African healthcare systems.
Medical Disclaimer
This article is intended for educational and informational purposes and is not a substitute for individualized medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. The investigation and management of suspected amyloidosis should be guided by appropriately qualified healthcare professionals, specialist assessment and applicable local clinical guidance.
We advance cardiac amyloidosis care across Africa through collaboration, training, and research. Join us to change the future of heart health and empower local clinicians with knowledge and tools.
Leave a Reply